Thom Tillis opposes “executive overreach” with Trump national emergency declaration

U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis cited “executive overreach” in opposing President Donald Trump’s announcement today that he’d use emergency powers to divert money toward a wall on the country’s southern border.

In a statement, North Carolina’s junior senator said he agrees with a border wall as a solution, but doesn’t believe a national emergency declaration is the way to achieve it.

He warned that future Democratic presidents could cite the same authority to unilaterally implement bad policy, like a President Bernie Sanders shutting down power plants under a “radical Green New Deal” or a President Elizabeth Warren taking over banks or a President Cory Booker seizing guns.

“While I agree with President Trump’s policy goal, I don’t believe in situational principles, and it’s clear what kind of rabbit hole our country can go down when we have a Democratic President who wants more government intrusion into our economy and our lives,” Tillis said in the statement.

1 Comment on "Thom Tillis opposes “executive overreach” with Trump national emergency declaration"

  1. CINDY E SASSAMAN | February 16, 2019 at 3:35 pm | Reply

    Congress passed the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which I have attached below from CONGRESS.GOV. This is long overdue and President Trump is following thru on a law that was previously approved but not fully addressed.

    Summary: H.R.6061 — 109th Congress (2005-2006)
    Public Law No: 109-367 (10/26/2006)
    Secure Fence Act of 2006 – Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security, within 18 months of enactment of this Act, to take appropriate actions to achieve operational control over U.S. international land and maritime borders, including: (1) systematic border surveillance through more effective use of personnel and technology, such as unmanned aerial vehicles, ground-based sensors, satellites, radar coverage, and cameras; and (2) physical infrastructure enhancements to prevent unlawful border entry and facilitate border access by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, such as additional checkpoints, all weather access roads, and vehicle barriers.

    Defines “operational control” as the prevention of all unlawful U.S. entries, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband.

    Directs the Secretary to report annually to Congress on border control progress.

    Amends the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 to direct the Secretary to provide at least two layers of reinforced fencing, installation of additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors extending: (1) from ten miles west of the Tecate, California, port of entry to ten miles east of the Tecate, California, port of entry; (2) from ten miles west of the Calexico, California, port of entry to five miles east of the Douglas, Arizona, port of entry (requiring installation of an interlocking surveillance camera system by May 30, 2007, and fence completion by May 30, 2008); (3) from five miles west of the Columbus, New Mexico, port of entry to ten miles east of El Paso, Texas; (4) from five miles northwest of the Del Rio, Texas, port of entry to five miles southeast of the Eagle Pass, Texas, port of entry; and (5) 15 miles northwest of the Laredo, Texas, port of entry to the Brownsville, Texas, port of entry (requiring fence completion from 15 miles northwest of the Laredo, Texas, port of entry to 15 southeast of the Laredo, Texas, port of entry by December 31, 2008).

    States that if an area has an elevation grade exceeding 10% the Secretary may use other means to secure such area, including surveillance and barrier tools.

    Directs the Secretary to: (1) study and report to the House Committee on Homeland Security and the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on the necessity, feasibility, and economic impact of constructing a state-of-the-art infrastructure security system along the U.S. northern international land and maritime border; and (2) evaluate and report to such Committees on U.S. Customs and Border Protection authority (and possible expansion of authority) to stop fleeing vehicles that enter the United States illegally, including related training, technology, and equipment reviews.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*